| |
This
research is motivated by the needs of a general manufacturing plant,
where several material handling technologies may be used to satisfy
the material handling requirements. The problem of selecting and specifying
material handling systems for manufacturing operations is addressed.
This is a complex problem, because of the flexibility of material
handling technologies: often there is more than one technical solution.
In addition, material handling technologies exhibit considerable fixed
costs. As a result, it is often better to select fewer technologies
and assign some tasks to technologies that are not the “first
choice” based on criteria that might be used in an expert systems
approach.
In earlier work there was developed a specification framework that
included the individual task specification, which reflects whether
the task is a move, a storage, an inspection, a sequencing, or other
operation. Here the physical attributes of the load, such as weight,
size, fragility, etc., and the task such as vertical displacement,
horizontal displacement, positioning accuracy, etc., are important.
The main function in this step is to eliminate technologies that are
not capable of satisfying the requirements of individual tasks and
to match single-task resources with the needs. The earlier work also
included fast analysis tools to obtain performance estimates for material
handling systems so that system selection can be made on a reasonable
basis. These fast analysis tools are tailored to the various topologies
for material handling technology. They are at a level appropriate
for implementation on a personal computer using personal productivity
software.
To complete the four-step specification framework outlined in the
earlier work, this research addresses the following steps: 1) task
aggregation, and 2) subsystem selection. Task aggregation is performed
using cluster analysis. Two general methods were evaluated for this
purpose: statistical clustering algorithms and optimization-based
algorithms. In post-aggregation analysis, the clusters are re-examined
with a view toward splitting and combining clusters, and exchanging
tasks among clusters. An intersection algorithm was developed for
this purpose. Subsystem selection is performed using a set covering
optimization technique. In addition, the fast analysis tools have
been augmented to include cost models; the earlier versions only reflected
performance. The four-step specification framework is demonstrated
using a case study from Camille Motor Works.
Contact: gunter.sharp@isye.gatech.edu
|